Twitter...

Posts Tagged ‘hate’

Proud to be an American

What does it mean to be British? Not a lot really. I’m not British, I’m English and I don’t know many people who would describe themselves as British. In the United Kingdom we have got Scots, Irish, Welsh, English, Cornish, Indian, Pakistani, Jamaicans, Jews, Ethiopians, Bangladeshi, Polish and a whole heap of other cultures.

In the US you will find African Americans, Irish Americans, Jewish Americans and many others but they are all Americans. Their relative racial harmony may stem from the fact that they all pledge allegiance to their country; meanwhile in the UK the different groups fight each other to retain their identity. The BNP is gaining ground in the UK at the moment because they are appealing to the whites who are fed a stream of fear inducing ‘news’ about immigration, young black men stabbing each other and benefit frauds. They wish to promote ‘British’ to mean white nationals and this will further cement the divides. If we want to live in a country that accepts different cultures then we must start to identify British as a diverse and ethnically varied single culture.

Quote of the day

Heroin-addict single mum, on the decision to place her children in the care of a gay couple in a stable home:

“I did not under any circumstances want my children to be placed with gay men. I wanted them to have a mum and a dad.”

And in the same breath:

“I have nothing against gay people. I’ve got gay friends…”

Save it, sister. You damn near destroyed the lives of those children. You can’t even take care of your own body. YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS.

PS: there are some more cracking quotes in the article!

Cruising for Scientologie

One of my close family members is an alcoholic, or to quote a popular tshirt, she’s a drunk (because alcoholics go to meetings). She wasn’t always a drunk but she has always been a borderline sociopath with very little empathy for others and this has exhibited itself quite strongly over the last decade while she has covered up her tracks. Apart from isolating her youngest child from his paternal grandparents and spreading rumours about her other children to discredit their stories of her drinking she managed to polarise many of her family members in a big dispute that she orchestrated. She relied on the fact that she could stage manage her family by keeping them from trusting each other and feeding them carefully crafted versions of her ‘truth’ that in most cases directly contradicted each other. She promoted various unsavoury rumours about family members, going so far as to accuse a grandparent of being a paedophile, in order to keep disparate members of the family from talking to each other and told several family members that I was a drug addict when I mentioned to a family member that her drinking was getting out of hand.  

Eventually the matter came to the attention of Children’s Services and during the proceedings with them she maintained many separate personalities and was charming and helpful to those she believed to be of influence and rude and abusive to everyone else. She relied on the fact that the different staff members were rarely present at the same time in order to give her ‘truth’ to anyone who would listen. Children’s Services, with a care order in hand, ensured that she was supervised at all times when with her youngest child so that she would not be able to manipulate him with her version of the events. Eventually her finely constructed web of lies fall by the wayside when the courts were able to pick through all the reports prepared by various different social workers, family members and friends to come up with an integrated and overall view. Her lies did not stand up to scrutiny and one of her older children was granted guardianship of her youngest child. Since all contact with family is now done in an open and recorded setting she has no opportunity to manipulate the truth and so family members who were once loyal to her have seen the real truth behind her lies.

This story sprung right into the forefront of my mind when I read about the practices or Scientology, a popular and growing cult which has gained a lot of fame for the many Hollywood A-listers who make up the ‘faithful’. Scientology is shrouded in secrecy and uses a phalanx of lawyers to protect it from any form of criticism. They use intellectual property rights to protect the inner workings of their bizarre auditing machines (a device which appears to measure electrical resistance through the body) and have direct access to the ebay systems in order to remove listings for second hand auditing machines. Scientology has even been accused of using search engine optimisation to ensure that search engine results about Scientology are positive and that negative search results are buried.

L Ron Hubbard, the father of “dianetics”, was a science fiction writer who later repackaged his ideas about dianetics using the concept of ‘Scientologie’ which he borrowed from Dr. A. Nordenholz. Dr Nordenholz was a german who published a book in 1934 which concerned itself with the science of understanding and consciousness. While the original dianetics piece was not particularly successful (self published and with little circulation, a true vanity piece) the later, probably borrowed, ideas of Scientology have been more successful and amassed LRH a considerable personal wealth prior to his death.

The Scientology corporation continues now after his death and for a few thousand dollars you can buy into their stories of aliens and mystical science machines. For a few more bucks you can train up to be an auditor and then charge your fellow Scientologists for the pleasure of being audited (hmmm, a cynic might say ‘pyramid’ right about now). Those who are critical of Scientology continue to endure negative propaganda and those who attack it are branded as whackos, conspiracy theorists and bigots.

Of course now that I have published something slightly critical of Scientology I shall no doubt be branded a whacko, conspiracy theorist or bigot. One of those accusations would be true.

A short thought piece

I have been wanting for a while to write an article that suitably articulates my theory on a link between evolution, selective breeding and the bible thumpers of America. This is just a thought piece at the moment and has no substantiation whatsoever.

A lot of the early settlers that moved to the US and occupy the mid west were the oppressed puritanical whackos, they left europe and became the dominant group in an otherwise uninhabited (from the european perspective) area. As the dominant group, not only did they ensure that their offspring were of a similar mindset but they can also ensure that outsiders or those that do not think the way they do are not as successful as those who conform. As the area was rich in resources the population has been able to explode almost unhindered in this new territory in the same way as the rabbits that were introduced to Australia.

God hates pretty much everything

Spot the Difference

As a Humanist with Darwinian pretensions, I find that Religion as a topic for discussion gets pretty easy laughs among my peers – who unsurprisingly tend towards the same beliefs.
Not all of them however. I was raised a Catholic and my parents are still devout Christians. One of my closest friends is as well, along with a myriad of other people I interact with on a regular basis. My point is that I’m by no means isolated from people of faith. Faith and religion form a part of my everyday existence.

So to clarify my personal beliefs, let’s all do something that I have been doing for years: let’s separate the concept of Faith and Religion.  See these concepts as two distinct entities. I’m going to take Christianity as an example because I’m most familiar with it.

Faith may be described as the belief in a higher intelligence which, in whatever form it takes, created the universe and is deserving of worship. You don’t need to belong to a particular type of group or body in order to believe this. You simply have to have faith.
Religion, then, can be described as the organised gathering of people who share a particular faith. Again the most obvious in the Western world is the Roman Catholic Church. The main objective of the Church as a Religion is to promulgate, preach and otherwise propagate the word of God as the One Truth.

So far, so harmless. Until we look back at the Church’s history and see just how it went about spreading the Word.
It has done so through murder, rape and pillage. It has done so through war, blood and torture. Christianity has become the West’s dominant religion not through mass voluntary conversion, or even through its message of God Almighty. It has quite frankly butchered its way to the top of the religious food chain and remained in power long enough for most people to have forgotten (or conveniently ignored) the fact that it murdered its way there. The Inquisitions. The Crusades. The destruction of the Pagan faith in the UK. Allying Paganism with Devil worship (which is just daft – Pagans don’t even believe in the Devil).

This, then, is what the Church’s power is built on today. And that is my issue with Organised Religion. I’m going to borrow a little from Marx  now, and say that Religion (not Faith – keep the concepts separate) is a very good way of stopping people from thinking for themselves – not only not thinking for themselves, but believing that blind devotion is the right way to go through life. It keeps millions of people pacified – the opiate of the masses, indeed; keeping its followers tractable, impressionable and docile and, most importantly, unquestioning.
Because that’s what Religion fears: it fears the free-thinking mind, the inquisitive nature of the curious and the intellectual.
Why? Because free-thinking minds cannot be controlled. As Richard Dawkins has commented – “…thinking is anathema to religion.”

But not to Faith.

Let’s look at Faith now. Taking the description above – albeit a simple one, but I want to keep things to their lowest common denominator – being a member of a Religion requires faith as a prerequisite. However, it is not necessary to belong to a Religion in order to have Faith. There are countless people around the world who have used Faith as motivation to do good. I can’t and won’t “conveniently” ignore or deny that. The Faith of individuals and small groups has caused the most incredible acts of charity.

But when a body gets too big to govern itself, it begins to create a hierarchy in order to govern it. And that is the beginning of Religion, and the loss of an individual’s control over what they believe and determining for themselves how they ought to live their lives.
The perceived need to be told what to do, how to think – “am I doing this right?” “Will my peers think I’m wrong?” “What if I’ve being worshipping/praying/living differently to others like me?”. This seems to be a fundamental aspect of human nature – the desire to belong and to be accepted. Conformity.  Again, not a bad thing – this isn’t a black and white issue.
However, as soon as we begin striving for not just conformity, but hegemony of thought and belief, we open the door for a hierarchy more concerned with retaining power than guiding its flock.
And that’s not what people need. Nobody needs Organised Religion. Some people need Faith to sustain them. And that’s fine by me. Religion has tried to teach us that we need it. In point of fact it’s the opposite: Religion needs us to survive.

But we don’t need it. You don’t need it. Your faith (if you have one) is all you need to sustain you.

The Pope’s comments in his end of year address only prove (to me at least) that the Church is hanging on to the social taboos of over 2000 years ago and preaching it as the Truth. The Church may well promulgate, preach and otherwise propagate the word of God – but in doing so it preaches hate, intolerance and injustice.
That’s not what Faith is. That’s not how we become better people, more enlightened or more tolerant of others. What Religion does now is preach fear and hate.
Don’t betray your Faith any longer. Break free, and live life the way you know, in your heart, your God wants you to live.