That's fucking stupid

Posts Tagged ‘iraq’

Jacqui Fucking Smith:

If people feel it appropriate to demonstrate against our troops coming home from defending this country abroad, we – as Government and others – will say in turn that we think that that’s wrong.

Cheers, Jacks. Thanks for that.

Here’s a bonus quote for you from our beloved W:

Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.

Peace out, kids, and keep those naughty thoughts to yourselves!

I have always wondered what would happen to a gorilla if it was trained to use an AK47 assault rifle. I guess some modifications would need to be made to the trigger guard and training a gorilla, especially one holding an AK47, might be a little difficult but they can be trained to communicate with sign language so it’s likely to be possible in terms of intelligence.

I expect that the gorilla would do what any animal would do once it has been given a competitive advantage over its peers, it would use the advantage to kill male gorillas and mate with female gorillas; as they have been genetically programmed to do. With no concept of our bizarre rules of society, or rather with their own rules that are quite different, surely the outcome would be very different from that which would happen when a human gets hold of firearms.

Now let’s imagine what would happen if that gorilla ruled a particular area of territory. With finite resources it might get greedy and want to expand its territory in order to expand the base of power that it controls. An area that is rich in resources might look rather attractive but if it means killing the dominant gorilla in that area then with no social rules to prevent it, what’s to stop it?

Now imagine that the gorilla is stripped of its AK47 (no volunteers for that job) and is removed from its position of power and status. Put it in a cage and feed it regularly while providing visual stimulus and what would happen? With no need to go out hunting and foraging the gorilla would become lazy and rather than spending its days looking after its young would become idle and let its captors provide for its young. With no need to provide for all the baby gorillas I would expect our gorilla to spend its time playing, eating and fucking female gorillas in order to make more baby gorillas. With very little investment in the baby gorillas I would not expect our gorilla to care much about them.

I absolutely love the idea of civilisation as a way to improve the position of the western white nations, making them also look all benevolent and lovely, while simultaneously crushing the development of other parts of the world. It takes a delightfully nasty self-serving streak to come up with an idea like the UN, democracy and international war crimes tribunals because it all has this greasy veneer of respectability.

Take the concept of war crimes, an oxymoron in itself because in a war the concept of crimes are a little blurred. It’s not a war crime for the US to drop a bomb on Japan that kills or injures many hundreds of thousands of people, it’s not a war crime for the imperialistic British to use guns against tribes with spears, it’s not a war crime for the coalition forces to invade a country and force its leader to endure a humiliating show trial before being hung on live TV; yet if any other nation did this sort of thing it would probably be considered a war crime.

War is an ugly and dirty thing, the idea of it is for one group to kill or capture as many of the opposition as possible while sustaining as few losses as possible. The winner is the one to inflict the most damage, or to persuade the loser that they should surrender. In order to make war more palatable to western voters the ideas of rules of engagement have been introduced to keep the losses down for western nations while allowing them to continue to bully the smaller nations. Iraq was an immoral war but it wasn’t illegal because historically the rules of war have been made by the winners.

Nuclear armament is also an area of incredible arrogance, the US and UK were responsible for creating and using the most ridiculously powerful weapon ever devised. Hundreds of thousands of people were killed but now we claim to have learned from our mistakes and only those countries which already have the power of nuclear weapons or the plentiful energy of nuclear power can keep it; all the other, less developed, countries are prevented from taking the same developmental steps. Many of the human rights and ‘Geneva convention’ standards which western nations have devised are pretty self serving because they are standards which we did not adhere to during our own development yet treaties such as Kyoto which had the potential to stifle the growth of developed nations were swiftly ignored with no repercussions.

Now don’t get me wrong here, I am not saying that this is the wrong way for things to be as I am a westerner and benefit directly from this arrangement, but let’s be honest about it. The US invaded Iraq because they could, with no strong opposition (such as that provided by the USSR during the cold war) they were free to go bully some little middle eastern nation. No UN mandate exists to try Bush for war crimes because the US is still the dominant force in the world, so let’s just be honest about what we did. The mandate of all these trivial little war crimes tribunals comes directly from the dominant groups and they can change the goalposts at any time by creating installations such as Camp X-Ray which operate under a whole new set of rules made up for the occasion.

When I was a kid I liked to play cops and robbers; I always ended up being one of the robbers and my big sister would be one of the cops. That way she could guarantee that she was the goodie and would of course ultimately triumph. We played cowboys and indians a bit too but she didn’t like that so much because as the elder sibling she needed a clear cut way to show that she was the goodie and I was the baddie and the line was not so clear in cowboys and indians. On the one hand the cowboys are gun toting bullies who are stealing the land of the noble indiginous people but on the other hand the cowboys were americans who were taming the wild west while being attacked by murderous savages. As it was the game taught us that sometimes it’s hard to tell if you are on the side of the right or the wrong: cops and robbers can very easily be transformed into Robin Hood and the nasty Sheriff and suddenly it’s the robbers who are the goodies and the cops who are the baddies.

During the second world war it was easy to tell that we were indeed on the right side, on the one hand we had the murdering nazis who were recklessly invading countries, persecuting their own citizens and generally being quite beastly. The stiff upper lipped brits could take a stand and later on once the beastly Japanese had executed their cowardly raid on Pearl Harbour it was the duty of every follower of Uncle Sam to help put a stop to this evil menace. Then along came the cold war and the west, with their freedoms and democracy, were ever vigilant against the threat of the mighty warmongering red storm. Stories about the treatment of political disidents showed us that we were resisting a threat which would take away our freedom and our trust in the state to protect us. While the two ideologies were incompatible there was still a fairly clear arguement that we were in the right, even if the opposition were not that far in the wrong (because they were not murdering people or invading much).

Roll on to ‘nam and it gets even more cloudy. Within vietnam there were those who were in favour of communism and those who were in favour of the US intervening. The numbers in favour of the US intervening were not that big but the US thought it prudent to save them anyway.

Then we had a reprieve when Gulf War 1 started. We were clearly the good guys because we were rescuing the peaceful and extremely rich nation of Kuwait from being annexed by the nasty big bully that was Iraq. We rolled in there and fired up our shit and then once we had liberated Kuwait we stopped at the border and didn’t lower ourselves to Iraqi standards by invading anywhere.

It all seemed to change on 11/9/2001 when a bunch of freedom fighters pulled off a death star scale attack on the US and global financialism in general. On the face of it we must be the goodies because the attack killed so many people yet that is not a measure of who is right and who is wrong because the US killed many tens of thousands of Iraqis in GW1. The first battle was to get in to the obvious target. Having spent a lot of time fighting the Russians when they were baddies; the Afghani people were clearly goodies so the Taliban had to be named and shamed as the vicious fundamentalist thugs that they were. The fact that they were effectively put into power by CIA meddling during the ’80s was glossed over but let’s not get ourselves all in a toot about that.

Once we had kicked the evil Taliban boogeyman out of power in Afghanistan the battle there was reduced to resistance fighters taking on the evil invading armies and that is why the coverage has dropped a fair bit since 2002.

Then it was time to get on to making those pesky evil Iraqi folk pay for their threatening behaviour. The US does not like anyone getting into their exclusive nukes club because then they have fewer bargaining chips and can’t invade whenever they like. It’s a bit like how they did not want the indians getting guns in the wild west because it was not that sporting if they shot back. The illusion of a threat of WMDs was created and it was all systems full ahead for an invasion and occupation of the country that has around a third of the worlds oil.

During this time the US has also been busy on the home front conducting torture, detention without trial and finding loopholes for any of the conventions that it has pushed for, signed and then not ratified. US soldiers were held by Iraqi forces in clear contravention of treaties of the Hague that Iraq did not sign and this was plastered all over the media as further evidence that they were the baddies yet the propaganda failed to mention that the US is not bound by such treaties either because they did not rattify them and so that means that the treaties are invalid in that conflict. In the last few year a nation has victimised their own citizens for political dissent and had a corrupt and unelected leader in charge. That nation has threatened to use WMDs while developing new ones. The nation I am talking about also refuses to be open with the UN about what chemical and biological weapons technology it has. The warmongering country has invaded and occupied countries and supported the invasion of Palestine by Israel. In fact if this was a war movie the country I am describing would have an army staffed by serious looking men in black uniforms; and yes, it’s the United States.

I don’t mean that the soldiers on the front line are evil. I also don’t mean that the average person at home in Wyoming is evil, or any more evil than a mother in Fallujah who sends her boys off to fight for freedom from the invading hoardes is. The soldiers are just kids doing a tough job for what they have been brought up to believe is right but it’s the political puppet masters that are out of check.